Zhuang Cai,
Tianjin University, China, caizhuang16@gmail.com PRIMARY
Mengyao
Chen, Tianjin University, China, chenmy@tju.edu.cn
Hanqing
Zhao, Tianjin University, China, hanqingzh@tju.edu.cn
Ying Zhao,
Central South University, China, Zhaoying511@gmail.com
Fangfang
Zhou, Central South University, China, zhouffang@gmail.com SUPERVISOR
Kang Zhang,
Tianjin University, China, kzhang@tju.edu.cn SUPERVISOR
Student Team: YES
D3
MYSQL
Excel
Visio
Approximately how many hours were spent
working on this submission in total?
About 180 hours (60 days and 3 hours
per day)
May we post your submission in the
Visual Analytics Benchmark Repository after VAST Challenge 2014 is complete?
YES
Video:
index.files\TJU-Cai-MC1-Demo.wmv
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Questions
MC1.1 – Provide a visual representation of the structure
of the Protectors of Kronos network, with supporting evidence.
a.
Who are the leaders?
b.
Who is part of the
extended network?
c.
How has the group
structure and organization changed over time?
d.
Where are the
potential connections between the POK and GAStech?
Provide novel
visualizations appropriate for communicating key information to the busy
leaders of the investigation. Please limit your response to no more than eight
images and 500 words.
In more than 10 years,
POK has evolved from a grassroot social movement organization consisting of
dozens of people to a terrorist organization which can call for hundreds of
thousands of people. We will describe the great change and status of POK from
the following 4 aspects.
a. The five
leaders of POK
Historically, POK had 5 key leaders, who
could be roughly divided into three generations. As shown in Fig. 1-1, on the
left, the 5 key leaders are Henk Bodrogi, Carmine Osvaldo, Elian Karel, Silvia
Marek and Mandor Vann. The figure shows
the relationships between them and the cause of their power transfer.
Considering the current scale and violence of POK, we speculate that public
leader Silvia Marek and behind the scene leader Mandor Vann were co-managing
POK. The right part of Fig.1-1 shows some
evidences related to the analysis of leadership discovered through our
visualization.
Fig.1-1 Summary of three generations of
five leaders and relevant evidence.
b. The extended network of POK
At present, many people or organizations
had become part of the extended network of POK. We group these people and
organizations according to their social attributes, summarized in Fig. 1-2. In
the process of searching for the extended network, email analysis, articles
analysis and personal analysis all play a very important role. Fig. 1-3
explains how we find an association between POK and the extended network
through visual analysis. Fig. 1-3(a) presents abnormal emails about APA from
journal of ARISE. Therefore, the sender and recipients of this email were
suspicious. Fig. 1-3(b) and Fig. 1-3(c) show the relationship between POK and
Homeland Illumination (inc. its correspondent Petrus Gerhard). Fig.1-3(d) shows
abnormal emails between Linnea Bergen (the leader of IT Department of GASTech)
and suspects.
Fig.1-2 Extended network with POK and categories.
Fig.1-3 Extended network with POK and relevant evidence
c. The evolution of organizational structure
Initially, POK was a grassroot social
movement organization fighting for its own rights and interests. But after
absorbing more young people with no work and education, POK has evolved into a
terrorist group which is organized in a hierarchy. The organization has
thousands of members. All the staff formed a typical pyramid structure divided
into two parts, peaceful and violent. Two parts were led by different people
and performed different tasks, as shown in Fig. 1-4. The left part of Fig.1-4
shows the evolvement of the organization structure, the middle and right parts
show the cause of this evolvement and evidences found from our visualization.
Fig.1-4 The changing
status of the POK structure and relevant evidence.
d. The potential connection between POK and GASTech
Some members of POK, such as Isia Vann and
Ruscellla Mies Haber, had lurked in GASTech for many years. Haber may be Mies’s
widow in POK. In 2013, a number of members who had the same family name with
the founders of POK entered GASTech. Some members of the Facilities, IT and
Engineering Departments also had potential connections with POK members because
of their partnerships in army, support for environmental movements, money
relationships, love relationships or common goals. Fig. 1-5 summarizes the
potential connections and the related figures’ priorities for investigation.
Fig.1-5 Summary of potential connections.
Fig.1-6 Evidences of the potential connections from individual information.
Fig.1-7 Evidences of the potential connections from emails.
MC1.2 – Describe the events of January 20-21,
2014. What is the timeline of events? Please limit your response to no more than
ten images and 500 words.
January 20-21 are two eventful days, full of conflicting
reports and confusing information. In Abila, many events occurred around the
disappearance of employees. Information of these events mainly came from three
major medias Homeland Illumination, Kronos Star and The Abila Post, each having
its own standpoint and bias. Media bias led to misleading reports. Therefore,
in the analysis, understanding the media bias is essential for finding what the
truth is. In Figure1-3(c), the RadVis shows the cluster and bias of media using
key words, reflecting reporting tendency.
Next, we analyze the events of Jan 20 and 21 from six
different aspects.
a.
We believe that in many
news reports, the two press conferences were important watersheds. The 34
events in January 20 are divided into three stages. Figures 2-1, 2-2 and 2-3
depict the flow of events in these 3 stages and their relationships.
Fig.2-1 The timeline of Stage 1.
Fig.2-2 The timeline of Stage 2.
Fig.2-3 The timeline
of Stage 3.
b.
Seven public announcements by 5
organizations largely oriented the public opinions on January 20 and 21. Fig. 2-4 shows the special subjects of important
events and information in visualization.
The timeline at the top shows these 7 announcements and their corresponding release organizations,
spokesmen, and contents. The corresponding scatterplot shows the media’s
responses to the public events.
Fig.2-4 Seven important public announcements.
c.
The events related to the
air transportation are important but uncertain. We summarize and visualize the
events. Fig. 2-5 shows the timeline of related jets which took-off and landed
in Abila Airport. The blue bubbles Fig.2-5 shows reports related to these jets.
Fig.2-5 Events and reports on the four jets.
d.
Fig. 2-6 shows the
information provided by staff in the first crime scene. Much of the information is about the people
in black who appeared in the celebration. Furthermore, staff also talked about
other interesting events.
Fig.2-6 Summary of the information
provided by employees.
e.
However, some hidden but
potentially important events also occurred alongside the public events. Fig.
2-7 summarizes these possibly hidden events, related reasoning and evidences.
Fig.2-7 Hidden events and relevant
evidences.
f.
Finally, in Fig. 2-8, we
summarize three main story lines, i.e. CEO storyline, public storyline, and missing storyline.
Fig.2-8 Summary of the three storylines.
MC1.3 – Identify at least two possible
explanations why the GAStech employees may be missing. What evidence do you
have to support each of these explanations? Please limit your response to no
more than three additional images and 200 words.
Given various types of conflicting findings
and evidences, we derived the following two reasonable conclusions:
Conjecture 1:
Having become a violent and carefully
crafted organization, and committed drug trafficking, POK could be highly
motivated in committing the crime. In addition, veteran employees did not get
what they deserved from the IPO, and thus motivated to join the crime.
With careful plot, at the annual
celebration on January 20, POK kidnapped GASTech executives in the chaos caused
by the false fire alarm. POK members may have used modified truck to carry the
kidnapees away.
This conjecture, however, could not
properly explain
a.
CEO’s
escape.
b.
Passengers
in the private jet
c.
The
people in black at the celebration
We therefore derive another, more
dramatic, conjecture.
Conjecture 2:
CEO and the leadership were already
aware of the crime, the people in black at the celebration came from an outside circle. When POK was
committing crime, GASTech set the trap, captured the six key criminal figures,
and kept them in a secret location, while announcing to the public that their
employees were kidnapped.
Fig. 3-1 shows our two conjectures for
the disappearance and Figures 3-2 and 3-3 show the relevant evidences.
Fig.3-1 two conjectures of the disappearance.
Fig.3-2 Evidences supporting Conjecture 1.
Fig.3-3 Evidences supporting Conjecture 2.